Brooks Ghost Max and HOKA Clifton 9 are two standout options that have garnered loyal followings among runners. Both are designed to offer comfort, support, and performance, but some key differences could make the HOKA Clifton 9 a better choice for some runners.
When I was in Chicago for the Chicago Spring Half Marathon and 10K, RoadRunner’s Sports had a kiosk for packet pickup. Since each shoe was $75, I bought both of these. Since they were so similar, comparing and contrasting them would be interesting. Make sure to read this blog because I thought I would prefer one and was pleasantly surprised.
Brooks Ghost Max
Pros:
Comfortable Fit — The Brooks Ghost Max features a plush, cushioned feel that many runners appreciate, especially those who prioritize comfort over long distances.
Durability — With a robust build, these shoes are known for their longevity, making them a reliable option for those who log a lot of miles.
Stability: The shoe offers good stability, which is ideal for runners with neutral pronation or those who need extra support.
Cons:
Weight — The Brooks Ghost Max tends to be a bit heavier compared to some other models, which might not be ideal for runners looking for a lighter, faster shoe.
Less Breathability — Some users have noted that the upper material isn’t as breathable, which can be a downside in warmer climates. I didn’t really feel this way but since there were some online comments, I thought I would share.
Price: $150 and they come in several different colors.
HOKA Clifton 9
Pros:
Lightweight Design — One of the most notable advantages of the HOKA Clifton 9 is its lightweight design, making it an excellent option for those who want a shoe that doesn’t feel cumbersome during runs.
Superior Cushioning — HOKA is renowned for its cushioning, and the Clifton 9 is no exception. It provides a soft, responsive ride that can help reduce fatigue on longer runs.
Breathability — The Clifton 9 features a more breathable upper, which enhances airflow and helps keep your feet cooler during intense workouts.
Flexible and Adaptive — The shoe’s design adapts well to various foot shapes and running styles, offering a versatile option for many runners. Some of the older models corrected pronation and these do not, making them super comfortable and responsive.
Cons:
Narrow Fit — Some runners may find the Clifton 9 to be a bit narrow, which could be uncomfortable for those with wider feet.
They are priced at $145 and come in several different colors.
What did I think?
Both the Brooks Ghost Max and HOKA Clifton 9 have their merits and can serve different types of runners well. If you’ve been a long-time fan of the Brooks Ghost series, the Ghost Max will likely deliver the familiar comfort and durability you’ve come to expect. However, if you’re open to trying something new, the HOKA Clifton 9 offers a compelling package with its lightweight design, superior cushioning, and breathability.
Ultimately, the choice between these two comes down to personal preference and specific running needs. For those seeking a fresher, lighter running experience with enhanced cushioning, the HOKA Clifton 9 might just have the edge over the Brooks Ghost Max.